Educational research resource. Contains sponsored placement — see editorial disclosure.

Phase 3 — Tirzepatide (Mounjaro)

SURPASS-2: trial summary, limitations and UK relevance

SURPASS-2 was the first head-to-head trial directly comparing a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist against a GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes. Tirzepatide, across its 5, 10 and 15 mg weekly doses, produced greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight than semaglutide 1.0 mg at 40 weeks. The comparator dose reflects semaglutide's approved glycaemic-control regimen for type 2 diabetes, not the higher 2.4 mg dose licensed specifically for weight management. SURPASS-2 provided the first direct evidence that dual incretin agonism can outperform GLP-1 mono-agonism on both glycaemic and weight endpoints within the same trial.

By Metabolic Peptides Editorial TeamReviewed by Scientific Review PanelLast updated
Evidence: Phase 3

Key findings

SURPASS-2 was the first head-to-head trial directly comparing a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist against a GLP-1 receptor agonist in adults with type 2 diabetes. Tirzepatide, across its 5, 10 and 15 mg weekly doses, produced greater reductions in HbA1c and body weight than semaglutide 1.0 mg at 40 weeks. The comparator dose reflects semaglutide's approved glycaemic-control regimen for type 2 diabetes, not the higher 2.4 mg dose licensed specifically for weight management. SURPASS-2 provided the first direct evidence that dual incretin agonism can outperform GLP-1 mono-agonism on both glycaemic and weight endpoints within the same trial.

Safety summary

GI adverse events (nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting) occurred at a broadly similar or somewhat higher frequency with tirzepatide relative to semaglutide 1.0 mg, concentrated during dose titration. Hypoglycaemia rates were low in both arms given the absence of concomitant sulfonylurea/insulin use in most participants.

Limitations

  • Semaglutide 1.0 mg is the licensed glycaemic-control dose for type 2 diabetes, not the 2.4 mg weight-management dose (Wegovy) — the comparison does not generalise to a weight-management head-to-head.
  • 40-week duration cannot establish long-term durability, cardiovascular outcomes, or safety beyond the trial period.
  • Active-comparator design provides relative rather than placebo-controlled efficacy data.
  • Trial population was limited to those inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy; generalisability to other treatment-experience profiles is limited.

UK relevance

Directly informs UK clinical choice between tirzepatide (Mounjaro) and semaglutide at the glycaemic-control dose for adults with type 2 diabetes, relevant to NHS prescribing pathways and NICE technology-appraisal comparisons.

What this evidence does not prove
  • Does not compare tirzepatide against the 2.4 mg semaglutide weight-management dose — the comparator was the lower type 2 diabetes glycaemic-control dose.
  • Greater HbA1c and weight reduction versus an active comparator does not establish superior cardiovascular or long-term outcomes.
  • Does not establish findings in populations beyond metformin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Frequently asked questions

What made SURPASS-2 significant?

SURPASS-2 was the first head-to-head trial comparing a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist (tirzepatide) against an established GLP-1 receptor agonist (semaglutide) in adults with type 2 diabetes, reporting greater HbA1c and body-weight reduction with tirzepatide at 40 weeks.

Was semaglutide compared at its weight-management dose?

No. SURPASS-2 used semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly, the licensed glycaemic-control dose for type 2 diabetes, not the 2.4 mg dose (Wegovy) licensed for weight management. Findings should not be generalised to a weight-management head-to-head comparison.

Does SURPASS-2 prove tirzepatide is safer than semaglutide?

No. SURPASS-2 measured HbA1c and body-weight change, not comparative safety outcomes. GI adverse events occurred in both arms and were broadly similar or somewhat more frequent with tirzepatide; the trial does not establish a superior long-term safety profile for either drug.

How is SURPASS-2 relevant to NHS prescribing choices?

SURPASS-2 is referenced in NICE technology appraisals and NHS clinical pathways comparing tirzepatide and semaglutide for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes, helping inform choice between the two licensed medicines at their respective diabetes doses.

Related peptide profiles

Related trials

Related conditions

Related mechanisms

Related safety signals

Source quality

Sources are tagged by class. Regulatory documents, peer-reviewed publications and trial registry records are preferred. Manufacturer disclosures and conference material are accepted where peer-reviewed publication is not yet available; preprints are flagged.

Last reviewed 4 July 2026 · SURPASS-2 trial summary · Metabolic Peptides editorial team